blk_mq_tag_update_depth() seems to be missing a memory barrier which
might cause the waker to not notice the waiter and fail to send a
wake_up as in the following figure.
blk_mq_tag_update_depth bt_get
------------------------------------------------------------------------
if (waitqueue_active(&bs->wait))
/* The CPU might reorder the test for
the waitqueue up here, before
prior writes complete */
prepare_to_wait(&bs->wait, &wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
tag = __bt_get(hctx, bt, last_tag,
tags);
/* Value set in bt_update_count not
visible yet */
bt_update_count(&tags->bitmap_tags, tdepth);
/* blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(tags, false); */
bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
wake_index = atomic_read(&bt->wake_index);
...
io_schedule();
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This patch adds the missing memory barrier.
I found this issue when I was looking through the linux source code
for places calling waitqueue_active() before wake_up*(), but without
preceding memory barriers, after sending a patch to fix a similar
issue in drivers/tty/n_tty.c (Details about the original issue can be
found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/28/849).
Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <ta...@ab.jp.nec.com>
---
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index ed96474..7a6b6e2 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool
include_reserve)
struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt;
int i, wake_index;
+ /*
+ * Make sure all changes prior to this are visible from other CPUs.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
wake_index = atomic_read(&bt->wake_index);
for (i = 0; i < BT_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
