On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 11:01:14AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:19:03AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 05:12:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Please see below for the fixed version. Thoughts?
> > >
> > > > + __releases(rnp->lock) /* But leaves rrupts disabled. */
> > > > + raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* rrupts remain disabled. */
> > > > + raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* rrupts already disabled.
> > > > */
> > >
> > > What them 'rrupts' about? ;-)
> >
> > Interrupts when it won't fit. I suppose I could use IRQs instead. ;-)
>
> In this particular case, "IRQs" works just as well; however, in general,
> this seems like an excellent example of when to ignore the 80-column
> guideline. :)
But but but... You are talking to someone who used actual PUNCHED CARDS
in real life in a paying job!!! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
