On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:37 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > We'd prefer one-patch-per-concept, please. This all sounds like about > six patches.
Understood. > We _could_ merge this patch as-is, but it means that when this stuff > finally hits mainline it would go in as a nice sequence of logical patches, > followed by a random thing which is splattered all over all the preceding > patches. Does this argue for a respin of the original patches, folding in content from this one, rather than splitting it into an additional six to be appended to the series? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
