On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:53:01PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/07/2015 01:26 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >Hey Jens, > > > >Please git pull an update branch to your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch (which > >oddly I don't see does not have the previous pull?) > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git > > stable/for-jens-4.3 > > > >which has two fixes - one where we use the Xen blockfront EFI driver and > >don't release all the requests, the other if the allocation of resources > >for a particular state failed - we would go back 'Closing' and assume that > >an structure would be allocated while in fact it may not be - and crash. > > > >Please pull! > > > >P.S. > >The patches also have 'sta...@vger.kernel.org' on them. > > > > drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 38 > > ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 ++- > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > >Cathy Avery (1): > > xen-blkfront: check for null drvdata in blkback_changed > > (XenbusStateClosing) > > > >Roger Pau Monne (1): > > xen/blkback: free requests on disconnection > > There's only one commit in that pull request, the patch from Roger is > already in mainline from the last pull request. I think your mistake is
Hm, indeed I see it now (after doing git pull from non-work machine). > looking at for-4.3/drivers - this branch is defunct as soon as Linus has > pulled the initial bits for 4.3. After that, for-linus is the branch that > carries fixes for the _current_ branch. Aaaa! That I had no clue about. OK, I will fix my workflow. Do you want me to repost this basing it on the 'for-linus' branch? Thanks! > > -- > Jens Axboe > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
