The old rcu_lockdep_assert() was retained to ease handling of incoming
patches, but any use will result in deprecated warnings. However, its
replacement, RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(), is now upstream. It is therefore
time to remove rcu_lockdep_assert(), which this commit does.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 21 ---------------------
1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 587eb057e2fa..a0189ba67fde 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -537,29 +537,9 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
-/* Deprecate rcu_lockdep_assert(): Use RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() instead. */
-static inline void __attribute((deprecated)) deprecate_rcu_lockdep_assert(void)
-{
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
/**
- * rcu_lockdep_assert - emit lockdep splat if specified condition not met
- * @c: condition to check
- * @s: informative message
- */
-#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s) \
- do { \
- static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
- deprecate_rcu_lockdep_assert(); \
- if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned && !(c)) { \
- __warned = true; \
- lockdep_rcu_suspicious(__FILE__, __LINE__, s); \
- } \
- } while (0)
-
-/**
* RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN - emit lockdep splat if specified condition is met
* @c: condition to check
* @s: informative message
@@ -596,7 +576,6 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
-#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s) deprecate_rcu_lockdep_assert()
#define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) do { } while (0)
#define rcu_sleep_check() do { } while (0)
--
2.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
