On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > Hello, > > > > here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would > > like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches > > 1-19) can be merged in the 4.4 merge window. The nfsd and nfs code should > > then go through the respective maintainer trees. > > Now way in this form even if everyone agrees we should have these > bastard ACLs. I certainly disagree. >
Where is the rationale for them? This url doesn't work: http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/ -- James Morris <jmor...@namei.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
