On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:48:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:32:43PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:39:10AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 01:03:11PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > > Similar to what we have for regular add/sub calls. For now, no actual
> > > > arch
> > > > implements them, so everyone falls back to the default atomics... iow,
> > > > nothing changes. These will be used in future primitives.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Maybe also do an aargh64 patch for this?
> >
> > I can follow up with that, since I'm about 60% through adding the
> > relaxed/acquire/release versions of all the other primitives. It's a fair
> > amount of work thanks to the new atomic instructions making me do everything
> > twice... (that and I've been on holiday this past week!)
>
> Right, what I meant was arm (I thought argh64 was the one with _relaxed
> bits in, but my memories tricked me, it was ARM).
>
> If you add new _relaxed ops, we'd better convert all archs that support
> _relaxed, which would be ARM (for now).
Right, yeah, arch/arm/ will need updating along with this series. Should
be straightforward to implement them in terms of atomic_{add,sub}_*.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
