Hi Jiri,
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:51:37PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:42PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> >
> > +/**
> > + * perf_evsel__is_dummy_tracking - Return whether given evsel is a dummy
> > + * event for tracking meta events only
> > + *
> > + * @evsel - evsel selector to be tested
> > + *
> > + * Return %true if event is a dummy tracking event
> > + */
> > +static inline bool perf_evsel__is_dummy_tracking(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> > +{
> > + return evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
> > + evsel->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY &&
> > + evsel->attr.task == 1 && evsel->attr.mmap == 1;
>
> should this use now check for evsel->tracking ?
Originally I think it need to differentiate the dummy tracking events
and possible other dummy events. But it seems no need to do it. So
yes, maybe I can just check the tracking bit.
Anyway, I need to check the Intel PT code as Adrian said it might have
multiple tracking events.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
