On 30 September 2015 at 05:50, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> +static void *etm_setup_aux(int cpu, void **pages,
>> + int nr_pages, bool overwrite)
>> +{
>> + struct coresight_device *csdev;
>> +
>> + if (cpu == -1)
>> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> +
>> + csdev = per_cpu(csdev_sink, cpu);
>> + if (!csdev)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return sink_ops(csdev)->setup_aux(csdev, cpu, pages,
>> + nr_pages, overwrite);
>
> Is it guaranteed that this sink would always have .setup_aux()?
A setup_aux() is vital to the design, both on Intel and ARM. I really
don't see how one could go without it. I can return NULL if it hasn't
been provided - that way the setup will fail without triggering a core
dump.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
