On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:13:45 +0100 Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote: > > the winner is... gregkh-driver-network-device.patch That was a fair bet - that patch has caused a mountain of grief. > Interesting. Looks very much like eth1394's sysfs interface is getting > in the way. And since it is entirely handled by the ieee1394 core, it > means ieee1394 needs the class_dev to dev treatment. I think it's OK if > we just wait for Greg to finish his preliminary patch. Until then, > CONFIG_IEEE1394_ETH1394=n should avoid the oops. (Or Andrew marks > eth1394 broken or removes gregkh-driver-network-device.patch...) Do we know what's actually wrong, and what needs to be done about it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
