On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:12:42PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> > So what this means is that on 32-bit systems, if we have a userspace
> > program which isn't using the Largefile-enabled, and it opens a file
> > which is larger than can be addressed with a 32-bit off_t, it can get
> > surprised and possibly cause data loss.
> 
> Good point.  I was initially thinking that 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit system
> would have O_LARGEFILE automatically enabled - but I guess it'll trap through
> the compat entry points which avoid that.
> 
> That said, fanotify and xfs_open_by_handle() will both automatically set
> O_LARGEFILE irrespectively of the 32-bitness of the original caller.

Any binaries that use xfs_open_by_handle() and then don't support
greater than 32bit file offsets are simply broken. No ifs or buts -
if you are using low level XFS specific file access ioctls, you need
to build binaries that support 64 bit offsets.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
da...@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to