On 09/22/2015 05:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > One other thing I just discovered: there are other consumers of the > topology sibling masks (e.g. topology_sibling_cpumask()) as well. > > I think we would want to avoid any optimizations based on those in > drivers as well, not only in the scheduler.
I'm beginning to lose the thread of the discussion here a bit. Juergen / Dario, could one of you summarize your two approaches, and the (alleged) advantages and disadvantages of each one? Thanks, -George -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
