Hallo, David. On 2006-11-17, David Brownell wrote: > This updates the RTC documentation to summarize the two APIs now available: > the old PC/AT one, and the new RTC class drivers. It also updates the > included "rtctest.c" file to better meet Linux style guidelines, and to > work with the new RTC drivers.
How about documenting things you've told me back in September? I.e. i386/amd64 have motorola RTC (and clones) based system clock setup in boot sequence "arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c". Also, how it interferes with time_hpet.c? There seem to be confusion what RTC timer and RTC clock is: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386226> Also util-linux package maintaining was under question in lkml recently. I think, i should update rc script i rewrote for hwclock with more info. I agree with you, that on PC hwclock is useless, unless dual-boot users are not in consern. I'll try to review and test patches. I wonder, why they were not posted before, but just before 2.6.19? Thanks! ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
