On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 21:15 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync
>
> init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list() should execute first, which is a
> core_initcall, so mark cpufreq_tsc() core_initcall_sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,11 @@ static int __init cpufreq_tsc(void)
> return 0;
> }
Here is the i386/sparc fixup
--------------->
From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [patch] cpufreq: register notifiers after the head init
init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list() must execute first, which is a
core_initcall, so move the registration to core_initcall_sync.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c
index fbc9582..4ebd903 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int __init cpufreq_tsc(void)
return ret;
}
-core_initcall(cpufreq_tsc);
+core_initcall_sync(cpufreq_tsc);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/time.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/time.c
index 061e1b1..c6eadcc 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/time.c
@@ -973,6 +973,13 @@ static struct notifier_block sparc64_cpu
.notifier_call = sparc64_cpufreq_notifier
};
+static int __init sparc64_cpu_freq_init(void)
+{
+ return cpufreq_register_notifier(&sparc64_cpufreq_notifier_block,
+ CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
+}
+core_initcall_sync(sparc64_cpu_freq_init);
+
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
static struct time_interpolator sparc64_cpu_interpolator = {
@@ -999,10 +1006,6 @@ void __init time_init(void)
(((NSEC_PER_SEC << SPARC64_NSEC_PER_CYC_SHIFT) +
(clock / 2)) / clock);
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
- cpufreq_register_notifier(&sparc64_cpufreq_notifier_block,
- CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
-#endif
}
unsigned long long sched_clock(void)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
