Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:

> That seems unlikely to work, so I suspect it gets a different definition.
> If it uses this definition and it does work, we can probably use
> 
> #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MIXED_BREAKPOINTS_REGS)
> 
> but that requires a comment explaining exactly why that works.

Are you suggesting wrapping the entire construct in this within the UAPI
header?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to