Hi, Am Donnerstag, 17. September 2015, 17:28:10 schrieb Caesar Wang: > >> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64, > >> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy). > > > > What happens to ARM32 then ? > > The dsb() is ok for ARM32, the ARM32/64 are OK if we can convert the > dsb() to dsb(sy). > I believe all drivers with 'dsb()' have same issue on ARM64 platform.
correct ... I read this up in the ARM docs 2 days ago too for something. The "sy" param is the default, which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb() and dsb(sy) are the same. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
