From: Oleg Drokin <gr...@linuxhacker.ru>

Part of effort of getting rid of custom Lustre allocation macros

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.dro...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_cfg.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_cfg.h 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_cfg.h
index 7b385b8..c80d78e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_cfg.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_cfg.h
@@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ static inline struct lustre_cfg *lustre_cfg_new(int cmd,
        char *ptr;
        int i;
 
-       OBD_ALLOC(lcfg, lustre_cfg_len(bufs->lcfg_bufcount,
-                                      bufs->lcfg_buflen));
+       lcfg = kzalloc(lustre_cfg_len(bufs->lcfg_bufcount, bufs->lcfg_buflen),
+                      GFP_NOFS);
        if (!lcfg)
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static inline void lustre_cfg_free(struct lustre_cfg *lcfg)
 
        len = lustre_cfg_len(lcfg->lcfg_bufcount, lcfg->lcfg_buflens);
 
-       OBD_FREE(lcfg, len);
+       kfree(lcfg);
        return;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to