On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:41:49AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:09:27AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 03:10:45AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2015-09-13 at 00:56 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > > > > me know. > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com> > > > > > > > > commit d74419495633493c9cd3f2bbeb7f3529d0edded6 upstream. > > > > > > > > Sebastian reported a crash caused by a jump label mismatch after resume. > > > > This happens because we do not save the kernel text section during > > > > suspend > > > > and therefore also do not restore it during resume, but use the kernel > > > > image > > > > that restores the old system. > > > [...] > > > > > > I don't think this is needed because jump labels aren't implemented in > > > 2.6.32. But maybe there was some other mechanism that changes the > > > kernel text on s390? > > > > Broken jump labels were the symptons when the problem was reported. However > > we lose everything that modifies kernel text without this patch. > > If it's not jump labels then there is still kprobes around where we have > > the same problem. > > Probably the patch description should have been better. > > OK so in the end you suggest you keep it in both 2.6.32 and 3.2 ?
Yes, please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
