On Sunday, September 13, 2015 12:08:19 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/09/11, Paul Moore wrote: > > Although I suppose if nothing else we could send a record indicating > > that another auditd attempted to replace it ... if we can send it > > great, drop the new request and be glad we audited it, if we can't > > send it, reset the auditd tracking. > > This is actually a good idea.
This would go well with your last patch to try harder on netlink send failures. On a related note, with the merge window closed I just rotated the audit tree so that patch is now in linux-audit#next. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/