* Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From my side... How can the correbolation be improved...?
> >
> > The best workflow would be for someone to send patches that are considered
> > clean enough.
>
> What do you mean by "patches that are considered clean"?
>
> "Clean" in the sense of is-not-a-hackery and/or
> patch-does-not-follow-Linux-kernel-development-guidelines [1]?
Both in the end.
> Oh, if we all would follow Peter H. blog-article "On commit messages" [2].
> ( /me dreams of a better world. )
So if _you_ start sending those patches then you need to fix known problems.
You don't have to keep the patches as-is as you found them, you are free to fix
them, open source and all that.
Just start simple, with a single, obvious looking patch, and we'll see from
there
on?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
