Hi,

We're noticing a rare race here with open() in tail(1), where this happens:

  tail --follow=name "file"
    /* "file" is unlinked() by another process */
    read(IN_ATTRIB from inotify); /* for st_nlink-- */
    open("file") /* Done to check if deleted, but this succeeds! */

The open() succeeding is surprising. Is that allowed?
The summary of the sequence in the kernel is:

  vfs_unlink() {
    mutex_lock(&(dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));
    security_inode_unlink(dir, dentry);
    try_break_deleg(target, delegated_inode);
    dir->i_op->unlink(dir, dentry);
    dont_mount(dentry);
    detach_mounts(dentry);
    mutex_unlock(&(dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));

    fsnotify_link_count(target)
    d_delete(dentry);
  }

thanks,
Pádraig.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to