On 2015/9/11 16:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 11-09-15, 23:41, Bai Ping wrote:+ if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) { + pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus"); + secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel"); + if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk) || IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) { + dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get clocks specific to imx6ul\n"); + ret = -ENOENT; + goto put_clk; + } + } + arm_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "arm"); pu_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "pu"); soc_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "soc"); @@ -331,6 +365,10 @@ put_clk: clk_put(step_clk); if (!IS_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) clk_put(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk); + if (!IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk)) + clk_put(pll2_bus_clk); + if (!IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) + clk_put(secondary_sel_clk); of_node_put(np); return ret; }As part of good coding practices, you should free resources in the reverse order to which they were allocated. The clocks don't follow that, but its not a problem with just your patch. That's how it is present today. Maybe you can write another patch to fix that.
thanks for your suggestion, I will pay more attention to it in future coding.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
