On 07.09.2015 16:04, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 3:37 PM
On 01.09.2015 14:07, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 10:03 AM
To fix this, each LAPIC/X2APIC entry from MADT table needs to be
handled at the same time when processing it, thus adding
acpi_subtable_proc structure which stores
() ACPI table id
() handler that processes table
() counter how many items has been processed and passing it to
acpi_table_parse_entries().
Why can't you leave the parsing code as is and create ApicId sorted list while
parsing LAPIC/X2APIC? You could call acpi_register_lapic() after all... Do I
miss something ?
Just to make sure I understand correctly - you suggest to replace
calls to acpi_register_lapic() with a code that builds an APIC ID list while
parsing LAPIC/X2APIC, and after parsing is done, go thru the list and call
acpi_register_lapic() on each APIC ID, correct?
Yes, does it work for you?
Hi Tomasz, sorry for late response, I was distracted by other things.
So, I see two options to build the list:
(a) use APIC ID as the table index
(b) always append APIC ID to the end of table, in the order that BIOS lists them
Also, my goal is to end up with enumeration like this (assuming there's 72
cores, 4 hyper threads each, total 288 logical CPUs):
APIC ID -> Logical ID
0 -> 0
1 -> 72
2 -> 144
3 -> 216
4 -> 1
5 -> 73
6 -> 145
7 -> 217
8 -> 2
...
284 -> 71
285 -> 143
286 -> 215
287 -> 287
Note that n,n+1,n+2,n+3 APIC IDs share same physical core, while being
separated by core count in logical listing (e.g. 0,72,144,216 share same
physical core).
Now, ACPI spec specifies how APIC IDs should be listed:
(1) Boot processor is listed first
(2) For multi-threaded processors, BIOS should list the first logical processor
of each of the individual multi-threaded processors in MADT before listing any
of the second logical processors.
(3) APIC IDs < 0xFF should be listed in APIC subtable, APIC IDs >= 0xFF should
be listed in X2APIC subtable
Keeping in mind above, BIOS lists APIC IDs as:
APIC (0,4,8, .., 252)
X2APIC (256,260,264, .. 284)
APIC (1,5,9,...,253)
X2API (257,261,265, 285)
etc
OK got it, your patches make sense then.
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
