On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: >> From: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com> >> >> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we >> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc. > > Hi Linus, > > It seems that linux-next has this copy of the patch as 5663bb27dec1, which > has a stray irq_desc_get_irq_chip in s3c24xx ; (2nd instance of "irq" is > bogus looking.) I first assumed it was from tglx since it did not have any > additional SOB lines, but on further investigation I traced it back to sfr's > merge of pinctrl/for-next.
Hm, saw this a bit late I guess. Torvalds has merged my trees, is there a problem in mainline that need to be addressed or did this fix itself? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
