On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 16:56 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07.09.2015 16:53, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Montag, 7. September 2015, 16:24:53 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > > I guess the easiest option would be to just drop the dwc2 from > > here, only > > keeping the phy enablement and let everything (Marek's and Sjoerd's > > patch) > > come together in the armsoc defconfig branch? As the rest of both > > patches don't > > seem to touch common areas, they should be easily mergable from > > different trees > > as well. > > Yes, I agree. The config PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB does not depend on it > directly > so this should work fine.
Sounds good, I'll wait a bit longer for more feedback and then send a V2 with patch 4 adjusted to just enable the rockchip PHY. Thanks for the feedback! -- Sjoerd Simons Collabora Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
