On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:32:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:12:34PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > You probably don't even need a VM to reproduce it - that would > > certainly be an interesting counterpoint if it didn't.... > > Even though you managed to restore your DEBUG_SPINLOCK performance by > changing virt_queued_spin_lock() to use __delay(1), I ran the thing on > actual hardware just to test. > > [ Note: In any case, I would recommend you use (or at least try) > PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS if you use VMs, as that is where we were looking for > performance, the test-and-set fallback really wasn't meant as a > performance option (although it clearly sucks worse than expected).
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 0 1600000 0 319431.5 10116018 0 3200000 0 307824.5 10054299 0 4800000 0 296971.5 10770197 0 6400000 0 281653.6 11748423 .... PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS seems to work OK these days, too. I'll leave that set so I'll end up testing whatever comes along down that pipe... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/