--- Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Davis wrote: > >>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers". > > > > ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care". > > > > > >>I don't want the pain of debugging crashes on the machines which run > >>unknown code > >>in kernel space. > > > > I'm not asking you to debug crashes. I'm simply requesting that the > > kernel stack size situation remain as it is: with 8K as the default > > and 4K configurable. > > I can be happy with 4K as the default, everything I use *except* > ndiswrapper seems to run fine (I don't currently need fancy filesystems) > but laptops seem to include a lot of unsupported hardware, which can't > be replaced due to resources (money, slots, batter life). > -- I could live with any default, as long as it's configurable. The intent here, however, is to take away the option. That's what I have an issue with. Is there any problem caused by letting stack size be configurable to any (sane) arbitrary maximum value (e.g. 32K)? > -bill davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the > last possible moment - but no longer" -me > I code, therefore I am __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
