> From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namhy...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Namhyung Kim
> 
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:21:48AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> > This patch suppresses message output by add_perf_probe_events() and
> > del_perf_probe_events() if they are triggered by BPF loading. Before
> > this patch, when using 'perf record' with BPF object/source as event
> > selector, following message will be output:
> >
> >      Added new event:
> >            perf_bpf_probe:lock_page_ret (on __lock_page%return)
> >         You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
> >                 perf record -e perf_bpf_probe:lock_page_ret -aR sleep 1
> >      ...
> >      Removed event: perf_bpf_probe:lock_page_ret
> >
> > Which is misleading, especially 'use it in all perf tools' because they
> > will be removed after 'pref record' exit.
> >
> > In this patch, a 'silent' field is appended into probe_conf to control
> > output. bpf__{,un}probe() set it to true when calling
> > {add,del}_perf_probe_events().
> 
> I think that printing those messages should be done in cmd_probe()
> rather than add/del_perf_probe_events()..

Well... try to cleanup the messages. 

Thanks!

> 

Reply via email to