On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:52:17PM +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > On 9/7/05, Chen, Kenneth W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Repost previously discussed patch (on Jul 27, 2005).
For reference: http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0507/14686.html > Do you have any benchmarks? Have you read the discussion? See: http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0507/14685.html Ken didn't post any benchmark results originally but clearly stated the cacheline misses were occurring enough to be measurable. Just knowing which workload and how much much time was spent stalling for cacheline misses should be sufficient. grant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
