This patch suppresses message output by add_perf_probe_events() and
del_perf_probe_events() if they are triggered by BPF loading. Before
this patch, when using 'perf record' with BPF object/source as event
selector, following message will be output:

     Added new event:
           perf_bpf_probe:lock_page_ret (on __lock_page%return)
        You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
                    perf record -e perf_bpf_probe:lock_page_ret -aR sleep 1
     ...
     Removed event: perf_bpf_probe:lock_page_ret

Which is misleading, especially 'use it in all perf tools' because they
will be removed after 'pref record' exit.

In this patch, a 'silent' field is appended into probe_conf to control
output. bpf__{,un}probe() set it to true when calling
{add,del}_perf_probe_events().

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangn...@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gr...@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
Cc: He Kuang <heku...@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
Cc: Kaixu Xia <xiaka...@huawei.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl>
Cc: Zefan Li <lize...@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3or...@163.com
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1440151770-129878-12-git-send-email-wangn...@huawei.com
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c  |  6 ++++++
 tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 tools/perf/util/probe-event.h |  1 +
 tools/perf/util/probe-file.c  |  5 ++++-
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
index c3bc0a8..77eeb99 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ static bool is_probed;
 int bpf__unprobe(void)
 {
        struct strfilter *delfilter;
+       bool old_silent = probe_conf.silent;
        int ret;
 
        if (!is_probed)
@@ -199,7 +200,9 @@ int bpf__unprobe(void)
                return -ENOMEM;
        }
 
+       probe_conf.silent = true;
        ret = del_perf_probe_events(delfilter);
+       probe_conf.silent = old_silent;
        strfilter__delete(delfilter);
        if (ret < 0 && is_probed)
                pr_debug("Error: failed to delete events: %s\n",
@@ -215,6 +218,7 @@ int bpf__probe(void)
        struct bpf_object *obj, *tmp;
        struct bpf_program *prog;
        struct perf_probe_event *pevs;
+       bool old_silent = probe_conf.silent;
 
        pevs = calloc(MAX_PROBES, sizeof(pevs[0]));
        if (!pevs)
@@ -235,9 +239,11 @@ int bpf__probe(void)
                }
        }
 
+       probe_conf.silent = true;
        probe_conf.max_probes = MAX_PROBES;
        /* Let add_perf_probe_events generates probe_trace_event (tevs) */
        err = add_perf_probe_events(pevs, nr_events, false);
+       probe_conf.silent = old_silent;
 
        /* add_perf_probe_events return negative when fail */
        if (err < 0) {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
index 57a7bae..e720913 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
@@ -52,7 +52,9 @@
 #define PERFPROBE_GROUP "probe"
 
 bool probe_event_dry_run;      /* Dry run flag */
-struct probe_conf probe_conf;
+struct probe_conf probe_conf = {
+       .silent = false,
+};
 
 #define semantic_error(msg ...) pr_err("Semantic error :" msg)
 
@@ -2192,10 +2194,12 @@ static int show_perf_probe_event(const char *group, 
const char *event,
 
        ret = perf_probe_event__sprintf(group, event, pev, module, &buf);
        if (ret >= 0) {
-               if (use_stdout)
+               if (use_stdout && !probe_conf.silent)
                        printf("%s\n", buf.buf);
-               else
+               else if (!probe_conf.silent)
                        pr_info("%s\n", buf.buf);
+               else
+                       pr_debug("%s\n", buf.buf);
        }
        strbuf_release(&buf);
 
@@ -2418,7 +2422,10 @@ static int __add_probe_trace_events(struct 
perf_probe_event *pev,
        }
 
        ret = 0;
-       pr_info("Added new event%s\n", (ntevs > 1) ? "s:" : ":");
+       if (!probe_conf.silent)
+               pr_info("Added new event%s\n", (ntevs > 1) ? "s:" : ":");
+       else
+               pr_debug("Added new event%s\n", (ntevs > 1) ? "s:" : ":");
        for (i = 0; i < ntevs; i++) {
                tev = &tevs[i];
                /* Skip if the symbol is out of .text or blacklisted */
@@ -2454,7 +2461,7 @@ static int __add_probe_trace_events(struct 
perf_probe_event *pev,
                warn_uprobe_event_compat(tev);
 
        /* Note that it is possible to skip all events because of blacklist */
-       if (ret >= 0 && event) {
+       if (ret >= 0 && event && !probe_conf.silent) {
                /* Show how to use the event. */
                pr_info("\nYou can now use it in all perf tools, such as:\n\n");
                pr_info("\tperf record -e %s:%s -aR sleep 1\n\n", group, event);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
index 915f0d8..3ab9c3e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ struct probe_conf {
        bool    force_add;
        bool    no_inlines;
        int     max_probes;
+       bool    silent;
 };
 extern struct probe_conf probe_conf;
 extern bool probe_event_dry_run;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
index bbb2437..db7bd4c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
@@ -267,7 +267,10 @@ static int __del_trace_probe_event(int fd, struct str_node 
*ent)
                goto error;
        }
 
-       pr_info("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s);
+       if (!probe_conf.silent)
+               pr_info("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s);
+       else
+               pr_debug("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s);
        return 0;
 error:
        pr_warning("Failed to delete event: %s\n",
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to