> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:08:43AM -0400, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
> >
> > print_aggr fails to print per-core/per-socket statistics after commit
> > 582ec0829b3d ("perf stat: Fix per-socket output bug for uncore
> > events") if events have differnt cpus. Because in print_aggr,
> > aggr_get_id needs index (not cpu id) to find core/pkg id. Also, evsel
> > cpu maps should be used to get aggregated id.
> >
> > Here is an example.
> > Counting events cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/. (Uncore event
> has
> > cpumask 0,18)
> >
> > "perf stat -e cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ -C0,18 --per-core
> > sleep 2"
> >
> > Without this patch, it failes to get CPU 18 result.
> > Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,18':
> >
> > S0-C0 1 7526851 cycles
> > S0-C0 1 1.05 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> > S1-C0 0 <not counted> cycles
> > S1-C0 0 <not counted> MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> >
> > With this patch, it can get both CPU0 and CPU18 result.
> > Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,18':
> >
> > S0-C0 1 6327768 cycles
> > S0-C0 1 0.47 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> > S1-C0 1 330228 cycles
> > S1-C0 1 0.29 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
>
Hi Arnaldo,
Could you please merge this patch?
This patch is to fix a bug of perf stat. It doesn't depend on
other patches of the patchset, and can be merged by itself.
Thanks,
Kan
> thanks,
> jirka
>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since V1
> > - Modify changelog
> > - Remove perf_evsel__get_cpumap_index
> >
> > tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 5 ++---
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > index 37e301a..47c3c1f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static void abs_printout(int id, int nr, struct
> > perf_evsel *evsel, double avg) static void print_aggr(char *prefix)
> > {
> > struct perf_evsel *counter;
> > - int cpu, cpu2, s, s2, id, nr;
> > + int cpu, s, s2, id, nr;
> > double uval;
> > u64 ena, run, val;
> >
> > @@ -707,8 +707,7 @@ static void print_aggr(char *prefix)
> > val = ena = run = 0;
> > nr = 0;
> > for (cpu = 0; cpu < perf_evsel__nr_cpus(counter);
> cpu++) {
> > - cpu2 = perf_evsel__cpus(counter)-
> >map[cpu];
> > - s2 = aggr_get_id(evsel_list->cpus, cpu2);
> > + s2 =
> aggr_get_id(perf_evsel__cpus(counter), cpu);
> > if (s2 != id)
> > continue;
> > val += perf_counts(counter->counts, cpu,
> 0)->val;
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
