On 8/17/2015 6:42 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
> Hi, Fabio,
Please don't top post.
>
> Based on the analysis and discussion, we prefer to use
> ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
Alison, when you submit v4 for this patch (adding
CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT=y as suggested), could you also send a
patch removing CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_config?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Alison Wang
>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Horia Geantă
>> <horia.gea...@freescale.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Another thing:
>>> Commit 385c0fb0e2c4 ("ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Select LS1021A")
>> added
>>> CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A in imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
>>>
>>> Besides this, booting a LS1021 AQDS board (Rev2) using
>>> imx_v6_v7_defconfig did not work (stuck at "Starting kernel").
>>
>> What would be the recommended approach?
>>
>> - Fix imx_v6_v7_defconfig so that it can make LS1021A to boot
>>
>> or
>>
>> - Use this proposed ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from
>> imx_v6_v7_defconfig?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
