On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 03:47:15PM +0900, byungchul.p...@lge.com wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 1be042a..3419f6c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2711,6 +2711,17 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct sched_entity
> *se, int update_tg)
>
> static void attach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct
> sched_entity *se)
> {
> + /*
> + * in case of migration and cgroup-change, more care should be taken
> + * because se's cfs_rq was changed, that means calling __update_load_avg
> + * with new cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time is meaningless. so we skip the
> + * update here. we have to update it with prev cfs_rq just before
> changing
> + * se's cfs_rq, and get here soon.
> + */
> + if (se->avg.last_update_time)
> + __update_load_avg(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)),
> + &se->avg, 0, 0, NULL);
> +
> se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> cfs_rq->avg.load_avg += se->avg.load_avg;
> cfs_rq->avg.load_sum += se->avg.load_sum;
you seem to have forgotten to remove the same logic from
enqueue_entity_load_avg(), which will now call __update_load_avg()
twice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
