* Stefan Smietanowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Alex Davis wrote: > >>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers". > > > > ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care". > > While ndiswrapper might not be closed source, I would not call the > windows driver it loads open source ...
Would it be possible for ndiswrapper to provide a seperate stack to the windows code so this problem is seperable? How debuggable is stack overrun? I mean if I am the unlucky admin who decides to setup a crypto/raid/stripe/thing setup which runs out of stack somewhere how easy will it be for someone who doesn't know the innards to know what happened as opposed to running into a random oops? Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
