On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Linus Torvalds > <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru> wrote: >>> >>> I realize this patch may be good to have in general, but >>> breaking userspace without a single warning is a bit >>> discouraging. Seems like the old "we don't break userspace" >>> rule have gone. >> >> That rule hasn't gone anywhere. >> >> Does a plain revert just fix everything? Because if so, that's the >> right thing to do, and we can just re-visit this later. >> >> I don't understand why Andy and Ingo are even discussing this. What >> the f*ck, guys? >> > > I'm trying to fix it without reverting. If that doesn't work, then we > revert. Yesterday, I thought I had a reasonably clean fix, but it > turned out that it only solved half of the problem. > > If we revert, I think I need to check what will break due to the > revert. I need to check at least Wine, and we'll have to do something > about all the selftests that will start failing. I also need to check > CRIU, and IIRC CRIU has started using the new sigcontext SS in new > versions.
I don't think Wine will be a problem, at least how it is currently set up. 16-bit support is only in the 32-bit build. The 64-bit build only supports Win64 apps, and will call the 32-bit version (installed in parallel) to run 32 and 16-bit apps. -- Brian Gerst -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
