Convert expression of the form (p->thread_info + 1) to use end_of_stack(), 
which makes it also more readable.

Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

 arch/arm/kernel/process.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c   |    4 ++--
 arch/arm26/kernel/traps.c |    4 ++--
 arch/ppc/kernel/process.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-mm/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-mm.orig/arch/arm/kernel/process.c 2005-09-01 21:04:49.408429938 
+0200
+++ linux-2.6-mm/arch/arm/kernel/process.c      2005-09-01 21:04:54.137617451 
+0200
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_stru
        if (!p || p == current || p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
                return 0;
 
-       stack_start = (unsigned long)(p->thread_info + 1);
+       stack_start = (unsigned long)end_of_stack(p);
        stack_end = ((unsigned long)p->thread_info) + THREAD_SIZE;
 
        fp = thread_saved_fp(p);
Index: linux-2.6-mm/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-mm.orig/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c   2005-09-01 13:21:50.000000000 
+0200
+++ linux-2.6-mm/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c        2005-09-01 21:04:54.169611954 
+0200
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_reg
        } else if (verify_stack(fp)) {
                printk("invalid frame pointer 0x%08x", fp);
                ok = 0;
-       } else if (fp < (unsigned long)(tsk->thread_info + 1))
+       } else if (fp < (unsigned long)end_of_stack(tsk))
                printk("frame pointer underflow");
        printk("\n");
 
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void die(const char *str, str
        print_modules();
        __show_regs(regs);
        printk("Process %s (pid: %d, stack limit = 0x%p)\n",
-               tsk->comm, tsk->pid, tsk->thread_info + 1);
+               tsk->comm, tsk->pid, end_of_stack(tsk));
 
        if (!user_mode(regs) || in_interrupt()) {
                dump_mem("Stack: ", regs->ARM_sp,
Index: linux-2.6-mm/arch/arm26/kernel/traps.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-mm.orig/arch/arm26/kernel/traps.c 2005-09-01 13:21:50.000000000 
+0200
+++ linux-2.6-mm/arch/arm26/kernel/traps.c      2005-09-01 21:04:54.188608690 
+0200
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs
        } else if (verify_stack(fp)) {
                printk("invalid frame pointer 0x%08x", fp);
                ok = 0;
-       } else if (fp < (unsigned long)(tsk->thread_info + 1))
+       } else if (fp < (unsigned long)end_of_stack(tsk))
                printk("frame pointer underflow");
        printk("\n");
 
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void die(const char *str, str
        printk("CPU: %d\n", smp_processor_id());
        show_regs(regs);
        printk("Process %s (pid: %d, stack limit = 0x%p)\n",
-               current->comm, current->pid, tsk->thread_info + 1);
+               current->comm, current->pid, end_of_stack(tsk));
 
        if (!user_mode(regs) || in_interrupt()) {
                __dump_stack(tsk, (unsigned long)(regs + 1));
Index: linux-2.6-mm/arch/ppc/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-mm.orig/arch/ppc/kernel/process.c 2005-09-01 13:21:50.000000000 
+0200
+++ linux-2.6-mm/arch/ppc/kernel/process.c      2005-09-01 21:04:54.236600445 
+0200
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
                        sp = tsk->thread.ksp;
        }
 
-       prev_sp = (unsigned long) (tsk->thread_info + 1);
+       prev_sp = (unsigned long)end_of_stack(tsk);
        stack_top = (unsigned long) tsk->thread_info + THREAD_SIZE;
        while (count < 16 && sp > prev_sp && sp < stack_top && (sp & 3) == 0) {
                if (count == 0) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to