On Friday, August 07, 2015 02:37:15 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/08/06, Paul Moore wrote: > > > I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not currently convinced that > > there is enough value in this to offset the risk I feel the loop > > presents. I understand the use cases that you are mentioning, the > > are the same as the last time we discussed this, but I'm going to > > need something better than that. > > Can you better describe the loop that concerns you? I don't quite see > it.
It would be the only loop in the patch, look at the for loop in audit_filter_rules() which iterates up the process' parent chain. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
