> On 03-08-15, 05:10, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > > IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
> > > is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> > 
> > @ from include/linux/err.h
> > #define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) unlikely((x) >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
> > ...
> > static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr)
> > {
> >     return !ptr || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
> > }
> > 
> > "!ptr" appears not covered with IS_ERR_OR_NULL.
> > (only the IS_ERR part seems covered)
> 
> Right, the first patch of the series has fixed that.
> 
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2009151

Ah.. ok, then,


Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo....@samsung.com>


please let me know when the series is ready to go.


Cheers,
MyungJoo

> 
> -- 
> viresh
> 
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i

Reply via email to