[PATCH 3.2 123/164] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

[Ben Hutchings]

3.2.70-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Wang Long <long.wangl...@huawei.com>

commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wangl...@huawei.com

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wangl...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_
 
        if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
                struct sched_param param = {
-                       .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+                       .sched_priority = producer_fifo
                };
                sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
        } else

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/