On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:06:45 -0300 Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <[email protected]> wrote:
> Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine > for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well > for struct with a huge list of elements. > > Keeping the arguments list inside the struct body makes it easier > to maintain the documentation. Interesting approach. I think it could make sense, but I fear pushback from a subset of maintainers refusing to accept this mode. I wonder what it would take to get a consensus on allowing these in-struct comments? I'm wondering if we need a kernel summit session on commenting conventions, markdown-in-kerneldoc, etc? Maybe I'll stick a proposal out there. Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
