4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]>

commit 2b42b09b88c831ba4da2d669581dde371c38c2af upstream.

With commit: e1e455f4f4d3 (perf tools: Work around lack of sched_getcpu
in glibc < 2.6), perf_bench numa mem with -c or -m option is not able to
correctly calculate convergence.

With the above commit, sched_getcpu always seems to return -1. The
intention of commit e1e455f was to add a sched_getcpu in glibc < 2.6.
Hence keep the sched_getcpu definition under an ifdef.

This regression happened occurred between v4.0 and v4.1

Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Vinson Lee <[email protected]>
Fixes:  e1e455f4f4d3 ("perf tools: Work around lack of sched_getcpu in glibc < 
2.6")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 tools/perf/util/cloexec.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
@@ -7,11 +7,15 @@
 
 static unsigned long flag = PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC;
 
+#ifdef __GLIBC_PREREQ
+#if !__GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 6)
 int __weak sched_getcpu(void)
 {
        errno = ENOSYS;
        return -1;
 }
+#endif
+#endif
 
 static int perf_flag_probe(void)
 {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to