* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There were only a few architectures utilizing finish_arch_switch() and it
> > looks
> > like they can all do without.
> >
> > This means we can remove finish_arch_switch(); partly to make up for
> > introducing finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), partly to reduce the number of
> > arch
> > hooks to consider.
> >
> > Much thanks to Ralf, Will and Chris for helping out with this!
>
> So the mips patch is already in Ralf's mips-next tree, which means I
> have to wait for that to his Linus' tree before I can commit the last
> patch in this series.
>
> It also means that all the other patches can go through their respective
> arch tree.
>
> So anybody who feels so inclined, go ahead, I'll check after the next
> merge window and commit everything that's left -- unless there's
> objections of course :-)
Sounds sensible to me!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
