Sure, I'll do that. Just wanted to know whether I should split the patches and send them in this same mail thread (may be something like [PATCH 01/04 V2]) or should I start new threads and send them separately to the respective maintainers.
Thanks and Regards, Saurabh Karajgaonkar On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:25:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:13:42PM +0000, Karajgaonkar, Saurabh (S.) wrote: > > From: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <skara...@visteon.com> > > > > This patch is created using simple_return.cocci coccinelle script. > > It replaces the redundant instances where variables are assigned > > return value from functions and then used in return statements. > > > > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <skara...@visteon.com> > > do you mind splitting this per-driver ? That makes it a lot easier for > different maintainers to take their part. For example, I would take > drivers/usb/phy/* and drivers/usb/musb/* > > Alan Stern would handle drivers/usb/host/[uoe]hci*.[ch] > > Mathias Nyman, driver/usb/host/xhci*.[ch] > > and so on. Thanks > > -- > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
