Am 30.07.2015 um 16:02 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> 
> 
> On 30/07/2015 15:57, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>>> +        /* Pairs with smp_wmb() in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu, in case
>>>>>> +         * the caller has read kvm->online_vcpus before (as is the case
>>>>>> +         * for kvm_for_each_vcpu, for example).
>>>>>> +         */
>> is somewhat distracting because of "read" and "before". So something like
>>
>>  /* Pairs with smp_wmb() in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu, to serialize the 
>> setting
>> of kvm->vcpus and setting kvm->online_vcpus....
>>
>> might be better.
> 
> What you are suggesting would go in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu, e.g.
> rewriting:
> 
>       /* Pairs with smp_rmb() in kvm_get_vcpu.  */
>       smp_wmb();
> 
> like this:
> 
>       /*
>        * Pairs with smp_rmb() in kvm_get_vcpu.  Write kvm->vcpus
>        * before kvm->online_vcpu's incremented value.
>        */
>       smp_wmb();
> 
> Instead, kvm_get_cpu has:
> 
>       /*
>        * Pairs with smp_wmb() in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu, in case
>        * the caller has read kvm->online_vcpus before (as is the case
>        * for kvm_for_each_vcpu, for example).
>        */
>       smp_rmb();
> 
> which already describes which loads are serialized here.
> 
> Is this correct?

Right you are.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to