On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:50:04AM -0700, Joshua Clayton wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 05:37:16 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c 
> > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > > index 83d4bca..1ded691 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > > @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ static inline char *translate_scan(struct _adapter 
> > > *padapter,
> > >   /* Add the protocol name */
> > >   iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWNAME;
> > >   if ((r8712_is_cckratesonly_included(pnetwork->network.
> > > -      SupportedRates)) == true) {
> > > +      rates)) == true) {
> > >           if (ht_cap == true)
> > >                   snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bn");
> > >           else
> > >                   snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11b");
> > >   } else if ((r8712_is_cckrates_included(pnetwork->network.
> > > -             SupportedRates)) == true) {
> > > +             rates)) == true) {
> > >           if (ht_cap == true)
> > >                   snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bgn");
> > >           else
> > 
> > The placement of the line breaks here is partucularly unpleasant.  Perhaps
> > that could be adjusted now that the field name is shorter.  Theer may be
> > some other cases in the patch where the line breaks could be adjusted to
> > improve readability.
> > 
> > julia
> I agree. Dan Carpenter earlier complained about me fixing up the lines
> while changing the variable name. Should that be a separate patch?
> 
Changing the line breaks here is a tiny change on the same line and so
it's fine.  It fits into the one thing per patch rule.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to