Am Freitag, den 24.07.2015, 17:21 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer:
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ac4499e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"
> +- syscon <&slcr>;
> +- #reset-cells: 1
> +
> +Example:
> +     rstc: rstc@240 {
> +             #reset-cells = <1>;
> +             compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl";
> +             syscon = <&slcr>;

Why the syscon phandle if rstc always is the child of slcr? Why not just
request the syscon for the rstc's parent node.

> +     };

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to