On 07/23/2015 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 18:22 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> On Wednesday 22 July 2015 16:52:00 Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>> Reorganize the logic checking battery health and under temperature
>>> condition checking.
> []
>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c
>>> b/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c
> []
>>> @@ -624,10 +626,34 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_read_pwr_avg(struct
>>> bq27xxx_device_info *di)
>>> */
>>> static int bq27xxx_battery_overtemp(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di, u16
>>> flags)
>>> {
>>> - if (di->chip == BQ27500 || di->chip == BQ27541)
>>> + if (di->chip == BQ27500 || di->chip == BQ27541 || di->chip == BQ27545)
>>> return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC | BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD);
>>> + if (di->chip == BQ27530 || di->chip == BQ27421)
>>> + return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OT;
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>
> Maybe this int function should be bool or return 0
> instead of false.
>
>>> +static int bq27xxx_battery_undertemp(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di, u16
>>> flags)
>>> +{
>>> + if (di->chip == BQ27530 || di->chip == BQ27421)
>>> + return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_UT;
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>
> Here too
>
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Returns true if a low state of charge condition is detected
>>> + */
>>> +static int bq27xxx_battery_dead(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di, u16 flags)
>>> +{
>>> + if (di->chip == BQ27000 || di->chip == BQ27010)
>>> + return flags & (BQ27000_FLAG_EDV1 | BQ27000_FLAG_EDVF);
>>> else
>>> - return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC;
>>> + return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_SOC1 | BQ27XXX_FLAG_SOCF);
>>> }
>
> and here
>
>
I think I'll change the return to bool as these functions are only used in an if
statement checking for true/false.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
