On 07/24/2015 09:25 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2015, 15:51 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer: >> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <[email protected]> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..ac4499e >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ >> +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl" >> +- syscon <&slcr>; >> +- #reset-cells: 1 >> + >> +Example: >> + rstc: rstc@240 { >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"; >> + syscon = <&slcr>; >> + }; > > Instead of the syscon property, why not specify that the rstc node must > be a child of the slcr node?
FYI: It is already a child node of SLCR if you look at location in DTS. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
