On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:46:26PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > +static void tegra_i2c_slave_write(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 val)
> > +{
> > + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, val, I2C_SL_RCVD);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * TODO: A correct fix needs to be found for this.
> > + *
> > + * We experience less incomplete messages with this delay than without
> > + * it, but we don't know why. Help is appreciated.
> > + */
>
> Uh oh. So I assume this is another reason for staging?I think we can live with this upstream, no need for staging. > > + if (!i2c_dev->slave || !i2c_dev->slave->slave_cb) > > + return -EINVAL; > > The core checks for slave_cb being valid. > > > + i2c_slave_event(i2c_dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &dummy); > > You could use value here, too, or? > > > + if (!tegra_i2c_slave_isr(irq, i2c_dev)) > > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > > Minor nit: I'd prefer == 0 here, since it reads "if not slave_isr return > handled". > > > + if (slave->addr > 0x7F) > > + addr2 = (slave->addr >> 7) | I2C_SL_ADDR2_TEN_BIT_MODE; > > Nope. There are 10 bit encodings of addresses 0x000-0x07f, too. So, you > need to check for the flag (slave->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN). If you'd fix up these and resend, I'll happily include this patch for 4.3 already. Thanks, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
