cpu_chain lost its __cpuinitdata annotation long ago in commit
5c113fbeed7a ("fix cpu_chain section mismatch..."). This and the global
__cpuinit annotation drop in v3.11 vanished the need to mark all users,
including transitive ones, with the __ref annotation. Just get rid of it
to not wrongly hide section mismatches.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <mini...@googlemail.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 5644ec5582b9..a5f2165b2dc4 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ void cpu_hotplug_enable(void)
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
/* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */
-int __ref register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
int ret;
cpu_maps_update_begin();
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int __ref register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
return ret;
}
-int __ref __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+int __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return raw_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
}
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void cpu_notify_nofail(unsigned long val, void *v)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__register_cpu_notifier);
-void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
cpu_maps_update_begin();
raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block
*nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
-void __ref __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+void __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
}
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct take_cpu_down_param {
};
/* Take this CPU down. */
-static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_param)
+static int take_cpu_down(void *_param)
{
struct take_cpu_down_param *param = _param;
int err;
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_param)
}
/* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
-static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
+static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
{
int err, nr_calls = 0;
void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ out_release:
return err;
}
-int __ref cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
+int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
{
int err;
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ void __weak arch_enable_nonboot_cpus_end(void)
{
}
-void __ref enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
+void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
int cpu, error;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
